On 5 October 2022, judgment was handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA (Sequana) and others. The judgment is significant to company directors, insolvency practitioners and litigators as it clarifies how directors should comply with their duties to creditors in the context of insolvency.

On 5 October 2022 a judgment was handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA (Sequana) and others.This judgment relates to an insolvency dispute between BTI, the assignee of AWA’s claims, and Sequana. Principally, it concerns which entity should make the payment for an outstanding liability incurred by AWA, arising out of the National Cash Register Company’s (NCR) pollution of the Fox River in Wisconsin. Through a series of restructurings, AWA became liable to indemnify British American Tobacco (BAT) for these costs.

On 28 March 2022, the Insolvency Service announced the end to all COVID-19 temporary measures, effective from 1 April 2022. Most measures had previously been revoked with the last of these measures being the restriction on winding up companies. This restriction was partially lifted in October last year in the course of the gradual phasing out of the restriction on winding up and it has now been lifted in its entirety. This could well lead to a significant increase in creditor activity following the inability to pursue most winding up petitions for a period of approximately two years.

2020 was a difficult and uncertain year, with unprecedented challenges across the globe, changing the world as we know it. At the start of 2021, the country remained in lockdown and Brexit materialised - with a deal - posing a further seismic shift. It remains unclear what the full effect of either will be on the economy. On the plus side, the active vaccination programme may offer us a route out of the pandemic. But one thing is clear, lawyers are resilient and our flexible fee structures and case funding options prove more important than ever. We are here, ready to help.

The new Temporary Insolvency Practice Direction gives much-needed clarity for insolvency proceedings in the Business and Property Courts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

General provisions

A key principle of English law is that double recovery of losses should be avoided. In company law a related concept has emerged, known as the principle of reflective loss. This prevents a shareholder in a company from suing a wrongdoer for the reduction in the value of shares or distributions when the loss suffered is a ‘reflection’ of a loss sustained by the company. The intention is to ensure equality between shareholders as a whole and to underline that each shareholder’s investment follows the fortunes of the company.

As noted in our previous Perspectives Article, in March 2020, the UK Government announced the suspension of the wrongful trading provisions contained in s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

In March 2020 the UK Government announced the suspension of the wrongful trading provisions contained in s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Those provisions impose personal liability on directors found to have over-traded while a company was insolvent. By removing the risk of personal liability, the Government sought to provide directors with the personal protection they required to allow their businesses to continue trading through the pandemic.

We ended 2019 wondering whether Brexit would remain as allconsuming as it had been the previous three years. Cue the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope this newsletter finds you, your colleagues and your family in good health and adjusted to the new 'normal'. We look back at the first three months of 2020, unforgettable in more ways than one, and how current developments may impact our future.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, on 28 March 2020, the Government announced the suspension of s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. This section imposes personal liability on directors found to have over-traded while a company was insolvent (so-called ‘wrongful trading’). By removing the risk of personal liability, the Government is providing directors with the personal protection they need to allow their businesses to continue trading through the pandemic. There are, however, likely to be negative consequences arising from the suspension, including for creditors.